"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
Cureus is on a mission to change the long-standing paradigm of medical publishing, where submitting research can be costly, complex and time-consuming.
The SIQ for this article will be revealed
emphysematous cystitis, septic shock, transplant kidney, immunocompromised, emphysematous pyelonephritis
Venu Chippa , Swetha Chenna, Rahul Gujarathi
Cite this article as: Chippa V, Chenna S, Gujarathi R (September 11, 2022) Emphysematous Pyelonephritis Involving Native Kidneys and a Transplanted Kidney. Cureus 14(9): e29024. doi:10.7759/cureus.29024
Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is an acute severe necrotizing form of UTI, with air collection in the renal parenchyma, collecting system, and surrounding tissues. Most common causative organisms are Escherichia coli and Klebsiella. Here we present a 71-year-old Caucasian male with multiple medical problems who was transferred to our ER from a long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) for hematuria, UTI, and septic shock. He is a recipient of a deceased donor renal transplant and was receiving IV amphotericin B for recent cryptococcal meningitis. CT abdomen showed bilateral EPN, including the transplanted kidney. He received aggressive fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, and IV antibiotics and got admitted to the ICU. Unfortunately, his clinical course worsened and required ventilatory support, and his family opted for comfort care because of the high mortality rate. The emphasis of this case report is to investigate immunocompromised patients presenting with UTIs for EPN.
Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a rare and severe form of acute necrotizing UTI, with air collection in the renal parenchyma, collecting system, and surrounding tissues. The first case of gas-forming necrotizing renal infection was reported in 1898 by Kelly and MacCallum. The direct and indirect cost of acute pyelonephritis is estimated at around 2.5 billion US dollars (the year 2000 values) in the US [1]. The pathogenesis of EPN is multifactorial. Compromised renal perfusion and urinary retention are major precipitating factors in the development of EPN. Escherichia coli is the most common causative organism, followed by Klebsiella sp., Proteus sp., Enterobacter sp., and rarely Streptococcus sp. and Candida sp. Diabetes mellitus, kidney stones, and immunocompromised state are significant risk factors.
With the current trends of increasing incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus and frequent use of abdominal imaging for abdominal discomfort associated with UTI, more and more cases of emphysematous cystitis (EC) and EPN are being diagnosed [2]. Women are predominantly affected with recurrent UTIs, and so as EPN, the female-to-male ratio is 5: 1. Left side is most commonly affected [3]. Bilateral EPN is reported in about 10% of patients [4]. The mortality rates in EPN are high, with about 50% with medical management alone and 15% even with surgical intervention/percutaneous drainage [5]. Septic renal transplant patients have threefold higher mortality than uncomplicated UTIs [6].
Even though EPN is commonly reported in radiology and urology journals, currently, internists provide most of the care for hospitalized patients, so we suggest EPN be in differential diagnoses while caring for diabetes and immunocompromised patients with complicated UTIs. Here we report a case of EPN involving both native and transplanted kidneys. To our knowledge, this is the first-ever reported case of EPN in the medical literature where all three kidneys are involved.
A 71-year-old Caucasian male was transferred from a long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) to our hospital with significant hematuria, UTI, and low blood pressure with suspected septic shock. About a month ago, he was diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia and disseminated cryptococcal infection, and is currently on amphotericin B. Past medical history is significant for a cerebrovascular accident with aphasia requiring tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with hemoglobin A1c of 8.6%, a deceased donor renal transplant five years ago on the right side, and recurrent extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) E. coli UTI. His current medications are prednisone, azathioprine, tacrolimus, aspirin, atorvastatin, furosemide, pantoprazole, folic acid, insulin, and amphotericin B.
The patient is nonverbal at baseline from his old stroke. In the ER, his blood pressure was 75/41 mmHg, temperature 36.6 °C, pulse rate 105 beats per minute (bpm), respiratory rate 26 per minute, and oxygen saturation of 96% on room air. On examination, he appeared in no distress, patent tracheostomy tube with bilateral basal crackles on both lung fields, normal S1-S2 with no murmur, soft and non-tender abdomen with faint bowel sounds, gastrostomy tube with the normal surrounding skin, was able to follow simple commands, and capillary refill time of 3-4 seconds with no extremity edema was noticed. Foley catheter showed cloudy and blood-tinged urine.
Complete blood picture (CBP) showed an increased WBC count of 20,000/mm³ with bandemia, hemoglobin of 8.1 g/dL, platelet count of 217,000/mm³, lactic acid of 5 mmol/L, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 92 mg/dL, creatinine 3 mg/dL (baseline BUN/creatinine 31/0.76), sodium 132 mmol/L, potassium 5.8 mmol/L, and bicarbonate of 16 mmol/L. Urinalysis showed turbid, pink-red urine, WBC of more than 100 per high-power field, packed RBCs, marked bacteria, large leukocyte esterase, positive nitrate, and more than 300 mg/dL of protein with a pH of 7. An ECG showed normal sinus rhythm. A chest X-ray showed decreased lung volumes with bibasilar atelectasis and a right-sided peripherally inserted central line (PICC), with its tip near the mid-right atrium. With elevated lactic acid, hypotension, and acute renal failure, a CT abdomen without contrast was done, which showed bilateral hydronephrosis, dilated transplant kidney, with gas in all three kidneys (Figures 1-3), collecting systems, ureters (Figures 2-4), and bladder wall emphysema (Figure 4).
In the ER, he received 30 milliliters per Kilogram of fluid resuscitation per sepsis protocol. Because of chronic steroid use, he also received 100 mg of hydrocortisone followed by 50 mg of hydrocortisone every six hours. He was started on norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure of 65 mm of Hg and IV meropenem, given his ESBL history [7]. He required admission to the ICU. With ongoing hematuria, his hemoglobin dropped and required one unit of packed RBCs. Immediate consultation with a urologist and nephrologist was obtained. Urology recommended emergent nephrostomy tubes for all three kidneys because of significant disease, as he was not a good surgical candidate. The patient has multiple risk factors, including septic shock at admission, immunocompromised state, acute renal failure, proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, and high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events during surgery.
Gupta Perioperative Estimated Risk probability for perioperative myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest is 7.8%. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) surgical risk showed 43% severe complications, 40% chance of death, 28.8% risk of developing sepsis, and 14% risk of pneumonia and cardiac complications [8]. Because of this, the family opted for conservative management with antibiotics, IV fluids, and vasopressors. Unfortunately, his hospital course further deteriorated, requiring ventilatory support 14 hours after admission. The patient's family opted for comfort care because of poor prognosis and rapid deterioration with profound sepsis requiring ventilatory support. The patient passed peacefully on the second day of admission. However, follow-up of his urine culture again grew ESBL E. coli.
The most common clinical symptoms of EPN are fever, flank pain, and pyuria. Unfortunately, there is no specific clinical presentation. The exact mechanism of gas formation and pathogenesis in EPN is unclear. However, the most commonly accepted hypothesis is the simultaneous presence of pathogenic fermenting bacteria, high serum glucose levels, and impaired tissue perfusion [9]. Diabetes mellitus and immunocompromised status are the major risk factors for EPN.
Since the 1970s, multiple radiologic classifications have been described for EPN. These classifications are based on gas in the renal parenchyma, Gerota fascia, and single or bilateral kidney involvement. The most recent classification in 2000 by Huang JJ and Tseng CC (Table 1) is a modified classification by Michaeli J et al. from 1984 [10].
EPN in transplant kidneys is classified by Al-Geizawi SM et al. (Table 2) based on the gas extension, the severity of the infection, and renal function impairment. Our case is classified as stage 3 [11].
EPN is diagnosed based on clinical and imaging findings. A plain abdominal X-ray can only detect gas 30% of the time. USG sometimes cannot clearly distinguish gas in the bowel from necrotic gas-filled kidneys, so a CT scan of the abdomen with and without contrast is the best diagnostic test that shows the presence of air and the extent of the disease [12]. Conservative management is generally preferred for classes 1 and 2 and stages 1 and 2, including parenteral antibiotic therapy and possible percutaneous drainage. Urgent endoscopic or percutaneous drainage and nephrectomy should be reserved for severe forms (classes 3 and 4 and stage 3) and those who failed conservative treatment with IV antibiotics and drainage [13].
If diagnosed early, the survival rate is around 75-85%. The presence of septic shock, bacteremia, hypoalbuminemia, proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, acute metabolic encephalopathy, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis, and polymicrobial infection has a poor prognosis. The presence of 2 or more of the above findings carries the highest mortality risk [14]. Severe proteinuria is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes. Our patient had septic shock, acute renal failure, and severe proteinuria. Age, gender, site of infection, and blood glucose level are not associated with mortality or poor outcome.
As EPN has no specific signs and symptoms, a high index of suspicion should be present in people with diabetes with UTIs. They are incredibly sick or slowly responding to standard IV antibiotic treatment. Early imaging should be performed to provide appropriate treatment. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, aggressive fluid resuscitation, glucose control, appropriate antibiotic use, and urgent urologic intervention (cystoscopy, stenting, percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement, or nephrectomy) should be performed to improve the symptoms. Broad-spectrum IV antibiotics should target Gram-negative bacteria, considering the patient's previous culture, sensitivities, and local antibiotic resistance patterns.
Historically, emergent nephrectomy has been the preferred treatment of choice for EPN. The success rate with conservative management and percutaneous drainage is around 60-80% [15]. The success rate with nephrectomy is around 70-90%. Bilateral nephrectomies are associated with extremely high mortality but may have shorter hospital stays. However, they also require lifelong renal replacement therapy, which has complications [10].
Our patient presented with septic shock and was immunocompromised, diabetic, and had class 4 EPN. Unfortunately, he was not a surgical candidate because of his very high cardiovascular risk.
EPN is a rare, life-threatening complicated UTI typically seen in diabetic patients. A high index of suspicion should be present for EPN in patients with known risk factors. CT abdomen with and without contrast is the definitive diagnostic test. Management is with aggressive fluid resuscitation, antibiotics, and early urologic interventions. Mortality rates are very high, just with aggressive medical management alone.
Internal Medicine, St. Vincent Medical Center, Evansville, USA
Internal Medicine, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, USA
Hospital Medicine, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, USA
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Chippa V, Chenna S, Gujarathi R (September 11, 2022) Emphysematous Pyelonephritis Involving Native Kidneys and a Transplanted Kidney. Cureus 14(9): e29024. doi:10.7759/cureus.29024
Peer review began: August 25, 2022 Peer review concluded: September 06, 2022 Published: September 11, 2022
© Copyright 2022 Chippa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.
This link will take you to a third party website that is not affiliated with Cureus, Inc. Please note that Cureus is not responsible for any content or activities contained within our partner or affiliate websites.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
High ratings should be reserved for work that is truly groundbreaking in its respective field. Anything above 5 should be considered above average. While all registered Cureus users can rate any published article, the opinion of domain experts is weighted appreciably more than that of non-specialists. An article’s SIQ™ will appear alongside the article after being rated twice and is recalculated with each additional rating.
Visit our SIQ™ page to find out more.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
Already have an account? Sign in.
Please note that by doing so you agree to be added to our monthly email newsletter distribution list.
By joining Cureus, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.